Janice Galloway’s, “Foreign Parts” Essay

Janice Galloways, contrasted separate explores the theme of fractured identity in an pass recognize and effective manner. In my SSL I shall explore how bodily social organization and contributionisation atomic number 18 central in the development of this theme with close consultence to the text, display excessively, how Janice Galloway engaged my interest in an effective way.Janice Galloway offers her readers something, which is a little to a greater extent controversial and appealing in its approach. Foreign Parts follows the story of cardinal fragmented womens search for belong, as they travel a extraneous country with useless maps and guides in the look forward to of acquiring some fashion of identity and independence. Galloway explores this overleap of identity, experienced at some point by us all, by fragmenting and splintering the text to reflect the jigsaw characters. This invention ponders how, We are neither real nor proper besides fraudulent moochers in sepa rate tidy sums territory, and encourages the reader to explore richly the issue of splintered identity. In doing so we cannot avoid acquiring an in-depth get wording of the techniques utilize by Galloway and her unique personal manner, also an appreciation of the importance of coordinate to the warms success.The structure, notably the use of fragmented sentencing, I believe plays an internal role in achieving this success. It not only encourages the reader to take an brisk part in piecing together the story, but also gives us an cortical potential into the characters themselves and of how they are fragmented and fractured in all respects.BRICOLAGEA foreign sacred scripture on a hoarding.Confronted by this term on arrival, it provides a adequate description of the central techniques used in the text. Bricolage, in French, is used when describing DIY fashioning something impertinently out of bits and pieces. In my eyeshot, this idea is central when talking of Rona a nd peacock flowers relationshipWe could make a go of it ourselves.Look by and by each otherHeterosexuality,Rona. A sick joke reclaim enough.They hankering to piece things together in a new way, provide other possibilities. They offer an alternative way of carriage, a challenge to naturalized good faith. This basic theme is made evident throughout the text, primarily by Galloways consistent use of the bricolage structure. She also achieves this fragmentation by introducing extracts from guidebooks and street signsNORMANDY is an agricultural region, full of farms and meadowland, orchards and rich green pastureThese extracts are what structure Rona and peacock flowers holiday their dependency upon these useless sources shows the want of elbow room they pack a bun in the oven in their lives. The guidebook they use entitled, Potted France is relevant in expressing that the characters are potted they do not appear all told and olfactory modality they are missing something from their lives. Primarily they insufficiency identity. The introduction of these extracts, reinforce the floor of fragmentation suffered by these characters. However, it is only one of the many jigsaw akin qualities of Rona and sweet wattle, who appear fragmented in every respect. The frequent use of the structureRona and Cassie,Cassie and Rona,I commend is used to show the fight for equation indoors their relationship and the unsure stance they also feel. Perhaps it is also relative in reimbursing the fact that Carrie and Rona are isolated from the community, yet squinch together because of their likeness. The space around this structure reflects the isolation of the characters. Their leave out of dwelling is true, in not only their personal relationship, but both socially and nationally making structure truly important in relaying the themes. Cassie and Rona go on to describe themselves as fraudulent moochers, this expresses how they feel they overlook social position . Also described as being in other peoples territory, it would search Cassie and Rona believe they have no agency nationally either.These c erstrns appear to be important themes within the book but I think they also reflect the interior(a) most personalities of the two womenPeople tried to buy us eat every morning, desperate to practice their English. Chris loved all that, talking in a drawl about the Houses of Parliament and London Our Capital. Its Edinburgh his damn capital only he didnt want to risk formulation that and have them think he was less important than they thought.Cassie cannot understand the need to talk in a drawl and deny your heritage, although she continues to refer to Scotland as such a wee country, showing the lack of significance it appears to have. Therefore Cassie experiences uncertainty in her search for belonging not only nationally, as is suggested above, but also finding a place historically proves difficult for her, as is made evident on Cassie and Ronas visit to a war cemeteryThe place was full of folk who belonged to somebody but none of them were hers. She had no right play acting or making up sentimental fictions magic spell her pal was busy.I think this shows perfectly Cassies character she needs to belong yet fails to do so, she strives to connect with people, but cannot seem to achieve her goal. She makes up sentimental fictions, as she has no sentimental memories of her avouch to reflect upon. Her past experiences with people had a negative effect on Cassie these experiences break into the present through memories and photographs and have a analogous effect to the extractsRona took lots of pictures. It was one of the things Rona did. Pictures of disconnected non-human things like mountains waterfalls and god knows.Cassies were all of people. People and animals but mostly people, smiling and congress lies.I believe the fact that her photos tell lies not only reveals the suspicious and quite bitter nature of Cassie , but also how Janice Galloway uses oppositions to emphasise the characters lack of belonging. Rona and Cassie, although close friends, differ hugely in comparison.Rona is the organised and much together of the two, she is prepared for anything.The bagthered be a incase with sticking plastersand god knows. In case. And under that, under that and under that, more seams of predictable preparedness for other in cases. In case.I think it is therefore strange that Rona (the controlled more ordered of the two) is the one to make the discoveries. For example, the sunflowers and prosperous dog, also the field of roses found in the dark. This is another technique, which in my opinion is used well by Galloway, she is not afraid to challenge conventional discourses or place spots and stripes side by side. This is what I consider responsible for creating intrigue and interest within the smart. Cassie the disjointed and fragmented character is passive in these discoveries and fails to achiev e independence. She strives to please the people around her and confesses that she, got comfort from knowing I could do something he in reality liked.Their dissimilarity in every particular except one, is what makes these characters feel they have no set place within society. It is their wish to challenge the conquering placed upon them by society is what I think connects these two women. someplace in that murky wee brain of his theres a major assumption that hes more real somehow, that were there to look after his ego because weve got bumps in the front of our jerseys and he hasntHe thinks the only reason we dont conjure is because were twisted, not because there was anything wrong with his expectations. Heterosexuality is a clear farce, Rona. A CON.This shows how these two heroines are not afraid to stand up and speak against stereotypical views it is this willingness to create a new lifestyle and whole other way of life that binds these two characters together. The fact that G alloway uses italics and capitalisation shows just how firm the characters are in their beliefs. The fact that they wish to challenge what is seen as the norm, leaves them without direction. They travel foreign countries with out-of-date, useless maps, which I believe reflects the lack of stability and direction they feel in their lives it is their bricolage approach to life, which produces fresh hope for the two women. This promise of hope is solidified as the end of Foreign Parts approachesI think its wonderful they dont just leave things falling to bits. They put them back together again.This in a sense can be seen as Ronas pact with Cassies BRICOLAGE theory an agreement with the new way of life she has offered. It is Ronas laughter that closes the novel, which offers hope in this planIt could be sledding home. God knows. Ive no sense of direction me. I seaportt a bloody clue. Rona and me. We stand in separate placesRona takes fresh aim, laughing. Defying gravity.This not only reflects the opposing personalities of the characters but also their rebellion against that which is expect defying gravity they defy that which is almost, in a sense, seen as mandatory in the progression of life.These women who were fragmented, jigsawed characters have, by their own selves, began to piece together a new life a life which defies traditional discourses. Their holiday together has disposed them a chance to allow self-discovery and has created hope for their future. Janice Galloways unique style is what I believe makes her novel, Foreign Parts truly accomplished. The disjointedness of her two characters is visualised perfectly throughout the book and is essential in relaying the themes Foreign Parts explores.Galloway is dependant on structure, primarily the fragmented text, to reflect the confusion and lack of identity and stability, experienced by the characters, it is this stylish use of structure that holds the key to the novels literary success. Galloways text closely intertwines theme, structure and character, it therefore proves a difficult task to dissect this novel, but once accomplished it reveals themes which are important and relevant to many people in todays society. It is qualities such as these, which make this intelligent novel a contemporary and yet controversial success.