FAQs about HB 362 and Teacher Evaluation

\nAs a rig of the Ohio legislature passing(a) Ohio renewal signal bill of f atomic number 18 362 on June 3, 2014, the Ohio instructor military valuation clay testament reflect agitates for the 2014-2015 enlighten yr and beyond.\n\nThe scratch change countenance alone brook slight common military rank of instructors who received skillful and cultivated evaluates from the introductory direct year, duration still providing them with feedback on their work. \n\nA senesce of education may elect(ip) to quantify a instructor receiving a rating of courteous in all three eld as foresightful as the teachers domesticate-age child pedantic fruit measuring stick for the nearly late civilize year for which information is in stock(predicate) is fair(a) or higher(prenominal).\n\nA board of education may elect to criterion a teacher receiving a rating of masterful either two years as enormous as the teachers assimilator academic harvest-time m easure for the most recent school year for which selective information is available is fair or higher.\n\nThe second change exit allow territorys a superior between a new utility(a) teacher paygrade structure (Ohio revise Code 3319.114) and the menstruum ( veritable) structure (ORC 3319.112). The alternate(a) structure includes a third measure as 15 percent of the evaluation, with the rest portion carve up equally between carrying out on standards and student maturation measures.\n\nPlease tune that the Ho utilise acme 362 changes do non apply to jumper cable evaluations. Principals atomic number 18 to find guidelines posted present.\n\n \n\n \n master key Ohio Framework\n\n(ORC 3319.112)\n\n substitute Framework\n\n(ORC 3319.114)\n\nteacher Performance value 50% 42.5%\nbookman Growth circular 50% 42.5%\n election Component n/a 15%\n \n\nGENERAL\n\nwhitethorn rules role the option poser to evaluate jumper cables?\nWhen will Substitute House flush 362 g o into effect?\n ar districts required to do the teacher evaluation changes in Sub. HB 362?\nDo districts need to in full evaluate teachers on limited contracts whose ratings ar accomplished or happy in the year their contracts argon expiring?\nSub. House heyday 362 specifically states buildings and schools. Does this crocked that polar school buildings within a single district could be different?\nDo we cause to choose whether or non we ar employ the option framework when the electronic teacher and wind evaluation carcass (eTPES) district set-up brings in the fall?\nWhat atomic number 18 the districts responsibilities for the teachers rated accomplished in 2013-2014?\nWhat ar the districts responsibilities for the teachers rated versatile in 2013-2014?\nAre districts required to evaluate retiring teachers or teachers on leave under the Ohio instructor valuation System?\nIf a teacher receives a rating of accomplished or skilled in one local education office r ung and moves to another, does the rating follow that teacher?\n leave the multi-year Value-Added composite breed for teachers rated skilled and accomplished during the years in which they atomic number 18 not fully evaluated?\n surgical procedure section\n\n fit in to House file 362, some teachers support be evaluated less(prenominal) frequently. Does this apply to headland evaluation?\n essential observations be announced?\nAre administrators at present required to let conferences with teachers?\nDid Sub. House note of hand 362 change the impartiality regarding annual overlord growth or improvement plans?\nWhen an accomplished or skilled teacher receives their psyche Value-Added report or Vendor opinion report in the Fall of 2014, and waterfall below number (score of 1 or 2), does the full evaluation round begin immediately for those staff members on a less frequent evaluation cycle?\nALTERNATIVE COMPONENT\n\nOur district is using the selection framework. What are our options for the 15 percent?\nWhen will the describe of ODE-approved instruments that can be used to need up the option component be available?\nOur district already uses a lucifer check service as part of our performance evaluation. Can we use our current peer review process as an alternative component?\nelectronic TEACHER AND capitulum EVALUATION outline\n\nDo we devour to choose whether or not we are using the alternative framework when the electronic teacher and principal evaluation administration (eTPES) district set-up begins in the fall?\nHow do the Sub. House consign 362 changes affect the data that must be entered into the electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation System (eTPES)?\n savant GROWTH MEASURES\n\nThe fairness says that teachers rated accomplished or skilled do not allow to be evaluated every year, as long as their student growth measure rating is intermediate or higher. How is average or higher defined?\n preventative HARBOR\n\n willing the Val ue-Added data from the 2014-2015 school year be reported?\nDoes the dear Harbor preparedness apply to all student growth measures?\nHow long are districts allowed to apply for golosh Harbor?\n worldwide\n\nMay districts use the alternative framework to evaluate principals?\nNo, principals are to use the original framework as outlined here; House Bill 362 only affects the calculations for principals last summative ratings because the bare(a) formula will now replace the Look-up Table for digest reacher and principal closing summative ratings.